Legal Opinion
Calzaturificio Rangoni S.P.A. v. United States Shoe Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided November 16, 1994No. 92 Civ. 2020 (JFK)PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
KEENAN, District Judge:
Before the Court is defendant’s motion for summary judgment seeking dismissal of all claims of plaintiff as stated in plaintiffs Amended Complaint, pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. 56. Also before the Court is plaintiffs cross motion for partial summary judgment in its favor upon Count Ten of the Amended Complaint and also with respect to paragraphs 25A, 30A, 44A, 47A, 50A, 53A, 56A, and 61A thereof. For the reasons that follow, the motion of defendant is granted. The motion of plaintiff is denied.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiff Calzaturificio Rangoni, S.p.A. (hereinafter…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Park 'N Fly, Inc. v. Dollar Park & Fly, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Harriet Ramseur v. Chase Manhattan BankCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Larry Marshak v. Faye Treadwell Treadwell Drifters, Inc the Drifters, Inc. Bowen Agency Ltd/admiral TalentCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- Hypnotic Hats, Ltd. v. Wintermantel Enters., LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
- Schmidt v. Fleet BankDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1998
- Telnikoff v. MatusevitchCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
- Goldfine v. SichenziaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.