Legal Opinion

Interstate Common Carrier Council of Maryland, Inc. v. United States

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided April 13, 1949No. 3959PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHESNUT, District Judge.

The Interstate Commerce Commission granted a certificate of authority to Samuel Schreiber and Mrs. Harry Schreiber, proprietors of a common carrier motor transportation business, to operate an alternate ■route from Baltimore, Maryland, to' Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, over U. S. Highway No. 1, for operating convenience only. The complaint in this case is brought to set aside the order of the Commission as invalid because not based on sufficient evidence to justify a finding that the grant of authority was required by public convenience and necessity.

The Schreibers 'have…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. New York Central Securities Corporation v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Alton Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. Texas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  4. A. B. & C. Motor Transp. Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1946
  5. Crichton v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1944

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Armored Carrier Corporation v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1966
  2. Arrow Transportation Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1959
  3. Slay Transportation Co., Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1973
  4. Yale Transport Corp. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1962
  5. Riss & Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1952

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API