Legal Opinion

Wunder v. Wunder

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 7, 1932No. 28,942PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

In this action on a money demand a verdict was directed for defendant. Plaintiff was denied a new trial and appeals.

Defendant is the father of Harvey J. Wunder, who departed this life April 27, 1930. As assignee of the policies he has collected the proceeds of the second block of insurance, hereinafter considered, on the life of Harvey.

Plaintiff’s “claim is that the assignments of said policies of insurance were procured by fraud, that a constructive trust ex maleficio in the proceeds of the insurance policies was thereby created, that the plaintiff is the beneficiary thereof and, therefore,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Tatge v. TatgeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1885
  2. Rollins v. MitchellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
  3. Maguire v. MaguireSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  4. Seastrand v. D. A. Foley & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
  5. Sieger v. SiegerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Suske v. StrakaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
  2. Owens v. OwensSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1940
  3. The Laura Baker School v. PflaumSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
  4. Salscheider v. HolmesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API