Tatge v. Tatge
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the district court for Bice' county, Buckham, J., presiding, refusing a new trial.
1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.
The material facts, as disclosed by the evidence,, and substantially as found by the court, are these. Plaintiff is thé son of the two defendants, who are husband and wife. In 1881 the-defendants, partly by way of advancement to plaintiff, and partly in consideration of an agreement by him for their support and maintenance, conveyed to him the premises in controversy. In 1882 the-plaintiff, ascertaining that a girl named Schultz, with whom he had been intimate, was pregnant, promised to marry her, but subsequently,, on consultation with members of his family, having some doubts as. to the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Gaston v. MerriamSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1885
- Townsend v. FentonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
3Cited by22 opinions
- Knox v. KnoxSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
- International Harvester Co. of America v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1906
- Acker v. PriestSupreme Court of Iowa · 1894
- Thompson v. NesheimSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
- Powder River Live Stock Co. v. LambNebraska Supreme Court · 1893
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.