Legal Opinion

In re Boston, H. & E. R.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

Decided February 15, 1872PublishedCited by 2 opinions

[Petition for review of the decision of the district court of the United States for the southern district of New Xork. [Application for adjudication of bankrupt-' cy. The district court denied the application of Seth Adams, for leave to intervene and oppose the application. Case No. 1,679.

1Opinion of the Court

WOODEUFF, Circuit Judge.

On the 21st of October, 1870, Seth Adams, a creditor of the Boston, Hartford and Erie Eailroad Company, filed his petition in the district court for the district of Massachusetts, alleging that the said company had committed an act of bankruptcy, and praying that: it be adjudged a bankrupt, &c. On the 20th. of December, 1870, James Alden, also a creditor, presented his petition, with a like-allegation and prayer, to the district court for the district of Connecticut. On the 31st of December, 1870, the said James Alden. presented his like petition to the district court…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. White v. CarpenterNew York Court of Chancery · 1830
  2. Consequa v. FanningNew York Court of Chancery · 1818
  3. Ferguson v. KimballNew York Court of Chancery · 1846

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Suggs v. Mutual Ben. Health & Accident Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1940
  2. Oklahoma ex rel. Wilson v. BlankenshipDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API