Precision Pine & Timber, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
DAMICH, Judge.
May the same contract be litigated in two different fora? The parties are presently litigating the same contract before this Court and the Agricultural Board of Contract Appeals (AGBCA). Because each forum is hearing an independent controversy, this Court permits this procedure.
By filing a complaint at the Court of Federal Claims, Precision Pine & Timber, Inc. (“Precision Pine”), on September 11, 1998, instituted this proceeding. The amended complaint alleges that the government breached 14 contracts and that this breach caused a loss of more than $13 million.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- The Sharman Company, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- E.D.S. Federal Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1983
- Roubin & Janeiro, Inc.United States Court of Claims · 1981
- Giuliani Contracting Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1990
- Multi-Roof Systems Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1984
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Rockwell Automation, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- American Renovation & Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
- Ch2m Hill Hanford Group, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
- Bes design/build, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2022
- Colonna's Shipyard, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.