Ch2m Hill Hanford Group, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
DAMICH, Chief Judge.
This action arises from a cost reimbursement incentive contract (“the Contract”) between Plaintiff CH2M Hill Hanford Group, Inc. (“Plaintiff”), an engineering, construction, and operations services company headquartered in Meridian, Colorado, and the United States Department of Energy (“DOE”). The Contract concerned Plaintiffs management of nuclear cleanup efforts at a decommissioned federal complex in southeastern Washington state (“the Hanford Site”) where weapons grade nuclear materials were once produced. This case focuses on whether Plaintiff was…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. Utah Construction & Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Astoria Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. SoliminoSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- San Remo Hotel, L. P. v. City & County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Joseph Morton Co., Inc., Appellant/cross-Appellee v. The United States, Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- BRC Lease Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- Gilbane Federal v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2026