Clark Development Co. v. Sonnenberg
West Virginia Supreme Court
Error to Circuit Court, McDowell County. Action of unlawful detainer by the Clark Development Company against S. Sonnenberg. Verdict and judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
POEEENBARQER, JUDGE :
Sonnenberg’s lease of a building belonging to the plaintiff, for one year, beginning, January 1, 1918, with a privilege of renewal for another year,, upon sixty days written notice, was renewed and was about to expire when the lessor, served notice on *376him,, in October 1919, admonishing him of the expiration of his lease, and requiring delivery of possession of the premises, January 1, 1920. He did hot vacate in compliance with this demand and an action of unlawful detainer was promptly instituted against him, resulting in a verdict and judgment for the defendant.
By way of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Rodgers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Dahnke v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
- Bateman & Bro. v. MaddoxTexas Supreme Court · 1894
- Stockett v. Bird's Adm'rCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1862
- Sobey v. BrisbeeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1865
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Bell v. VaughnArizona Supreme Court · 1935