Legal Opinion
Bateman & Bro. v. Maddox
Texas Supreme Court
Decided April 9, 1894No. 113PublishedCited by 34 opinions
Certified Questions from Court of Civil Appeals for Second District, in an appeal from Tarrant County.
1Opinion of the Court
BROWN, Associate Justice.
The Court of Civil Appeals for the Second Supreme Judicial District has certified to this court the following questions upon the facts stated:
“1. On the-day of June, 1888, appellee, Maddox, by a verbal contract, leased and rented to appellants, Bateman & Bro., a certain brick building situated in Tarrant County, Texas, upon the following terms: Bateman & Bro. were to have the building for five years. They were to rent the building for one year absolutely at the rental of $400 per month, payable monthly, with a right to move into it at any time after the 1st of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Becar v. . FluesNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
- Eaton v. WhitakerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1846
- T. L. Marsalis & Co. v. PitmanTexas Supreme Court · 1887
- Sobey v. BrisbeeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1865
- Hays v. CageTexas Supreme Court · 1847
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Hill v. HunterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
- Martin v. OrgainCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1909
- Jones v. WinterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1948
- Hayes v. ArringtonTennessee Supreme Court · 1902
- Hunt v. Merchandise Mart, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1965
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.