Legal Opinion

Bell v. Vaughn

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided December 23, 1935No. Civil No. 3614PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtMcALISTER, J.

— The plaintiff below, Belle Vaughn, owned fifty-three acres of land in Turna county, which the defendant, Joe Bell, occupied as a tenant during the year 1934. His lease was oral and a few days before it expired, or on December 22, 1934, the plaintiff gave him written notice to surrender possession on January 1, 1935. He refused to do so, but, according to the complaint, continued wilfully to hold possession of the premises after that date.

In his answer the defendant denied that his lease expired January 1, 1935, and that written notice to surrender possession of the premises had been served…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Ward v. . HasbrouckNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
  2. Young v. . DakeNew York Court of Appeals · 1851
  3. Bateman & Bro. v. MaddoxTexas Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Sobey v. BrisbeeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1865
  5. Huffman v. StarksIndiana Supreme Court · 1869

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Moeur v. Chiricahua Ranches Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API