Legal Opinion
In re Daniel H.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided October 26, 2010PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The appeal should be dismissed, without costs, on the ground that the two-Justice dissent at the Appellate Division was not on a question of law (see CPLR 5601 [a]).
*884Police arrested appellant Daniel H. at his school for the theft of credit cards after he had made an inculpatory statement without being advised of his Miranda rights. Appellant was transported to a precinct, left alone in an adult holding cell, and was again questioned by the same detectives in a sergeant’s office rather than a designated juvenile room. A written inculpatory statement was made by…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- People v. ChappleNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- People v. PaulmanNew York Court of Appeals · 2005
- People v. ConyersNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Merrill v. Albany Medical Center HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- Guaspari v. GorskyNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP v. KoukisNew York Court of Appeals · 2025
- In re Leroy M.New York Court of Appeals · 2011
- In re Trayvon J.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- In re Trayvon J.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- The Matter of Jamal S v. Presentment AgencyNew York Court of Appeals · 2016
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.