Legal Opinion · Dissent

In re Leroy M.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided February 17, 2011Published

1Dissent

Ciparick, J. (dissenting).

Attenuation is generally a mixed question of law and fact in juvenile delinquency adjudications, *248as in criminal cases (see Matter of Daniel H., 15 NY3d 883, 884 [2010]). However, the majority holds that the consent to search in this case was so obviously untainted by the improper police entry into the home as to be “attenuated ... as a matter of law” (see majority op at 247). I disagree and respectfully dissent.

As the majority observes, in determining whether consent to search is attenuated from the illegal police entry, “consideration must be given to a variety of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. BradfordNew York Court of Appeals · 2010
  2. People v. BorgesNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. In re Daniel H.New York Court of Appeals · 2010
  4. In re Leroy M.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API