Legal Opinion · Dissent

The Matter of Jamal S v. Presentment Agency

New York Court of Appeals

Decided October 27, 2016No. 146Published

1DissentRivera, J.

The appeal should be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction under CPLR 5601 (a) because the Appellate Division’s two-Justice dissent was not on a question of law. Accordingly, I would not reach the merits.

A party may take an appeal as of right from an order of the Appellate Division pursuant to CPLR 5601 (a) “where there is a dissent by at least two justices on a question of law in favor of the party taking such appeal” (CPLR 5601 [a]; Matter of Robert S., 76 NY2d 770 [1990]; see Arthur Karger, Powers of the New York Court of Appeals §§ 6:4, 6:5 at 200-207 [3d ed rev 2005]). No appeal lies where…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. People v. McRayNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. People v. HarrisonNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Feldsberg v. NitschkeNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. People v. WilliamsNew York Court of Appeals · 2011
  5. Merrill v. Albany Medical Center HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1988

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API