Legal Opinion

Kelley v. Hudson

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided September 19, 1966No. 8458PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COTTEY, Special Judge.

Plaintiff had judgment for damages for personal injuries allegedly suffered through defendant’s negligence, and defendant appeals. It is not contended that the award was excessive; liability is the disputed issue. Pending the appeal plaintiff died and his administratrix has been substituted as respondent in his stead, but for convenience we shall continue to refer to him as plaintiff in the cause. We have concluded that a retrial must be ordered for reasons presently to be discussed, and it is therefore necessary to set out only the facts that serve to introduce that…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Critcher v. Rudy Fick, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1958
  2. Monroe v. Chicago & Alton RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1923
  3. Hungate v. HudsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1945
  4. Commonwealth v. O'HARRAHCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1953
  5. Wood v. St. Louis Public Service Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1952

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Cantrell v. Superior Loan Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Farley v. Johnny Londoff Chevrolet, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. Jefferson v. BiggarSupreme Court of Missouri · 1967
  4. State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. HeimMissouri Court of Appeals · 1972
  5. State v. HowardMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API