Legal Opinion

Nedzad Miljkovic v. Shafritz and Dinkin, P.A.

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided June 30, 2015No. 14-13715PublishedCited by 143 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILSON, Circuit Judge:

Plaintiff-appellant Nedzad Miljkovic (Appellant) appeals from the district court’s dismissal with prejudice of his complaint against defendants-appellees Shaf-ritz and Dinkin, P.A. and Mitchell A. Din-kin (collectively, Appellees), debt-collection attorneys for non-party Publix Employees Federal Credit Union (Publix), for failure to state a claim under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA), see 15 U.S.C. §§ 1692-1692p. On appeal, we are tasked with determining the extent to which the conduct-regulating provisions of the FDCPA apply to actions taken by…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Russello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. United States v. American Trucking AssociationsSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  5. Lorillard v. PonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by143 opinions

  1. Connie Bishop v. Ross Earle & Bonan, P.A.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2016
  2. John Pinson v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, National AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2019
  3. Erick Marquez v. Weinstein, Pinson & Riley, P.SCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
  4. Taylor v. First Resolution Invest. Corp. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Meyer v. Fay Servicing, LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2019

138 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API