Nedzad Miljkovic v. Shafritz and Dinkin, P.A.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
WILSON, Circuit Judge:
Plaintiff-appellant Nedzad Miljkovic (Appellant) appeals from the district court’s dismissal with prejudice of his complaint against defendants-appellees Shaf-ritz and Dinkin, P.A. and Mitchell A. Din-kin (collectively, Appellees), debt-collection attorneys for non-party Publix Employees Federal Credit Union (Publix), for failure to state a claim under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA), see 15 U.S.C. §§ 1692-1692p. On appeal, we are tasked with determining the extent to which the conduct-regulating provisions of the FDCPA apply to actions taken by…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Russello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. American Trucking AssociationsSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Lorillard v. PonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by143 opinions
- Connie Bishop v. Ross Earle & Bonan, P.A.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2016
- John Pinson v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, National AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2019
- Erick Marquez v. Weinstein, Pinson & Riley, P.SCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
- Taylor v. First Resolution Invest. Corp. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
- Meyer v. Fay Servicing, LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2019
138 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.