Legal Opinion

Ezell v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 1, 1999No. ED 73870PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, Judge.

Andre Ezell (“Movant”) appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief following an eviden-tiary hearing, arguing: 1) the record does not refute Movant’s allegation that he would not have pled guilty but for trial counsel’s ineffective assistance in failing to investigate and prepare a defense for Mov-ant; 2) the record does not refute Mov-ant’s allegation that he would not have pled guilty but for trial counsel’s ineffective assistance in failing to recognize the jurisdictional limitations of the sentencing court and assuring Movant that…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. NunleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1998
  2. Brown v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Johnson v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006
  2. Watts v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006
  3. Evans v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003
  4. Bott v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
  5. Shaw v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API