Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

State v. Cantu

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided January 22, 1997No. 22349PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Per curiam

I

BACKGROUND AND PRIOR PROCEEDINGS

Felipe Cantu (Cantu) was charged with eleven controlled substance-related offenses, six of which included charges of conspiring with Rosario Reyes (Reyes) to deliver a controlled substance. The same attorney was appointed to represent both Cantu and Reyes. Prior to trial, the prosecutor approached the defense attorney and indicated that, if one of the defendants would plead guilty and agree to testify against the other, the prosecutor would recommend some type of a reduced sentence. Apparently, the defense attorney spoke individually with each defendant,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. HedgerIdaho Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Danial Siebert v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. State v. LankfordIdaho Supreme Court · 1989
  4. State v. OlinIdaho Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Associates Northwest, Inc. v. BeetsIdaho Court of Appeals · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. State v. Mark LankfordIdaho Supreme Court · 2017
  2. State v. CarlsonIdaho Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. State v. MacKIdaho Court of Appeals · 1999
  4. State v. AlwinIdaho Supreme Court · 2018
  5. State v. Gomez-AlasIdaho Supreme Court · 2020

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API