Legal Opinion
Coney v. Commissioner of Correction
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided November 10, 2009No. AC 29618PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ALVORD, J.
The petitioner, Paul Coney, 1 appeals following the denial of his petition for certification to appeal from the judgment of the habeas court denying his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The petitioner claims that the court improperly (1) denied his petition for certification to appeal and (2) denied his petition for a writ of habeas corpus that was based on his claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. We dismiss the petitioner’s appeal.
The relevant facts and procedural history are set forth in the decision of our Supreme Court disposing of the petitioner’s direct…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Simms v. Warden, State PrisonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Lozada v. DeedsSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Ledbetter v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- State v. ConeySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Sinchak v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
- Lopez v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
- Coney v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2022
- Coney v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2024
- Coney v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010