Legal Opinion
Rankins v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided April 19, 2024No. 3:23-cv-05785Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 TAMI RANKINS, Case No. 3:23-cv-05785-JSC 8 Plaintiff, ORDER RE: DEFENDANT’S MOTION 9 v. TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT 10 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC., Re: Dkt. No. 30 Defendant. 11 12 13 Tami Rankins sues United Parcel Service, Inc. (“UPS”) for discrimination because of her 14 age and gender, the intentional infliction of emotional distress, and for a breach of her 15 employment contract with the company, in violation of California laws. (Dkt. No. 26.)1 Now 16 pending before the Court is UPS’s motion to…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Karim Khoja v. Orexigen Therapeutics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Amerisourcebergen Corporation v. Dialysist West, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Hughes v. PairCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
- Schifando v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.