Legal Opinion

Kipahulu Investment Co. v. Seltzer Partnership

Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals

Decided December 9, 1983No. 8621; CIVIL NO. 3764PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

BURNS, C.J.

Plaintiff Kipahulu Investment Company (Kipahulu), a Hawaii general partnership, appeals the judgment denying its claim against defendants Seltzer Partnership (Seltzer), a Pennsylvania general partnership, and its partners for damages for breach of a land sale contract. Kipahulu and its partners appeal the $34,552.04 judgment against them in favor of Seltzer and its partners for breach of the same contract. We affirm.

In July 1973 Kipahulu purchased two parcels of land in Kipahulu, Maui: parcel 8-B-l (217.83 acres) and a forest reserve parcel (140 acres)…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Jenkins v. WiseHawaii Supreme Court · 1978
  2. State v. MillerHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Hebb v. SeversonWashington Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Sinclair v. WeberCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1954
  5. City and County of Honolulu v. BennettHawaii Supreme Court · 1976

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Amfac, Inc. v. Waikiki Beachcomber Investment Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Brown v. Yacht Club of Coeur D'Alene, Ltd.Idaho Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. Lundburg v. StinsonHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. Petran v. AllencastreHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1999
  5. Willow Ridge Ltd. Partnership v. Stewart Title Guaranty Co.District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API