Legal Opinion
Am. Bio Medica Corp. v. Todd Bailey, & Premier Biotech, Inc.
District Court, N.D. New York
Decided September 27, 2018No. 1:17-cv-302 (TJM/DJS)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
b. Misappropriation of Trade Secrets
Defendants claim that Counts 5 and 6 in the proposed Supplemental/Amended Complaint, which allege misappropriation of trade secrets, are also futile.
In New York, a plaintiff claiming misappropriation of a trade secret must show: "(1) it possessed a trade secret, and (2) defendant is using that trade secret in breach of an agreement, confidence, or duty, or as a result of discovery by improper means." Integrated Cash Mgmt. Serv., Inc. v. Dig. Transactions, Inc., 920 F.2d 171, 173 (2d Cir. 1990) ; see Norbrook Lab. Ltd. v. G.C. Hanford Mfg. Co., 297 F.Supp.2d…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Ruckelshaus v. Monsanto Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Corsello v. Verizon New York, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2012
- Ashland Management Inc. v. JanienNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
- Paramount Film Distributing Corp. v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
- North Atlantic Instruments, Inc., Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellee v. Fred Haber and Apex Signal Corp., Defendants-Counter-Claimants-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Rucano v. VenettozziDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2019
- Shawn Bradley Hills - Adversary ProceedingUnited States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. Illinois · 2019