Legal Opinion
In Re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-A
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 15, 2017PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Per curiam
Respondent was admitted to practice by this Court in 2000 and lists a business address in Schenectady County with the Office of Court Administration (hereinafter OCA). This Court suspended respondent from the practice of law in New York in 2014 due to conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice arising from her failure to comply with the attorney registration requirements of Judiciary Law § 468-a and Rules of the Chief Administrator of the Courts (22 NYCRR) § 118.1 (113 AD3d 1020, 1046 [2014]; see Judiciary Law § 468-a [5]; Rules of Professional Conduct [22 NYCRR 1200.0] rule 8.4…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Matter of BombaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- Matter of SommerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
3Cited by20 opinions
- Matter of Attorneys In Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a. (Smith)Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- Matter of Attorneys In Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a. (Squires)Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- Matter of Attorneys In Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a. (Timourian)Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a (Roberts)Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
- Matter of NayakAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.