Legal Opinion
Matter of Attorneys In Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a. (Smith)
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided July 13, 2017PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Per curiam
Respondent was admitted to practice by this Court in 1996 and lists a business address in Newark, New Jersey with the Office of Court Administration. By 2014 order, this Court suspended respondent from the practice of law in New York due to conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice arising from her failure to comply with the attorney registration requirements of Judiciary Law § 468-a and Rules of the Chief Administrator of the Courts (22 NYCRR) § 118.1 (113 AD3d 1020, 1036 [2014]; see Judiciary Law § 468-a [5]; Rules of Professional Conduct [22 NYCRR 1200.0] rule 8.4 [d]).…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- In Re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-AAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- Matter of SommerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
3Cited by28 opinions
- Matter of Attorneys In Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- Matter of Attorneys In Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a. (Squires)Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a. (Lawrence)Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
- Matter of Attorneys In Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a. (Timourian)Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a. (Holtz)Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.