Legal Opinion

Matter of Sommer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 18, 2017PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

Respondent was admitted to practice by this Court in 1981 after being admitted in New Jersey in 1976, where she maintains an office for the practice of law. Following respondent’s May 2013 conviction in the United States District Court of the District of New Jersey of the federal crime of conspiracy to structure transactions in order to evade a bank reporting requirement (see 18 USC § 371; see also 31 USC § 5324 [a] [3]; [d] [1]), the Supreme Court of New Jersey suspended respondent from the practice of law for one year, effective May 22, 2013 (Matter of Sommer, 217 NJ 359, 89 A3d 580…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Matter of SommerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Matter of Attorneys In Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a. (Smith)Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
  2. In Re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-AAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
  3. Matter of Attorneys In Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a. (Hughes-Hardaway)Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
  4. Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a (Pavlovic)Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022
  5. Matter of BrollesyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API