Legal Opinion
Cooper v. Booher
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided June 1, 2004No. 98,447PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBoudreau, J.
¶ 1 Deacon Cooper (Inmate), an inmate at John Lilley Correctional Center in Boley, Oklahoma, tested positive for use of marijuana and received administrative discipline. He appealed unsuccessfully to Glynn Booher (Warden) and then to the Director of the Oklahoma Department of Corrections (DOC), arguing that the drug test was administered in a manner not in accordance with DOC policy and not in accordance with the manufacturer’s recommendations. Inmate then filed what has been called in the papers before us a petition for writ of mandamus in district court asking the court to command prison…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Manley v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
- TXO Production Corp. v. Oklahoma Corp. CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
- Keating v. EdmondsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
- State Ex Rel. Tal v. City of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
- Arrow Tool & Gauge v. MeadSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2000
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Garnett v. Government Employees Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2008
- BEYRER v. THE MULESupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2021
- Hopkins v. ByrdCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2006
- BEYRER v. THE MULESupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2021
- Cooper v. BooherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2004
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.