Legal Opinion
Hopkins v. Byrd
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided September 26, 2006No. 101,887PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
JANE P. WISEMAN, Presiding Judge.
{1 Defendant, Amanda Byrd, appeals an order of the trial court denying her request for an award of attorney fees against Plaintiff, Leann Hopkins, pursuant to 12 0.8. Rev. Supp.2005 § 1101.1. Plaintiff counter-appeals the award of costs to Defendant pursuant to § 1101.1 and 12 0.8.2001 § 942. The issue on appeal is whether Defendant is entitled to costs and attorney fees even though her costs and attorney fees were paid by her liability insurer. We find that Defendant is entitled to an award of costs and attorney fees pursuant to § 1101.1, and affirm…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Nealis v. BairdSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
- Aspen v. BaylessSupreme Court of Florida · 1990
- Payne v. DewittSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
- Dulan v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
- Twin Hills Golf & Country Club, Inc. v. Town of Forest ParkSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Boston Avenue Management, Inc. v. Associated Resources, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
- Hubbard v. Kaiser-Francis Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2011
- Station Operation, LLC v. Circle K Stores, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2009
- Boston Avenue Management, Inc. v. Associated Resources, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
- Boston Avenue Management, Inc. v. Associated Resources, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.