Legal Opinion

San Antonio National Bank v. Blocker

Texas Supreme Court

Decided April 25, 1890No. 6565PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from Travis. Tried below before Hon. A. S. Walker.

1Opinion of the Court

HENRY, Associate Justice.

—The-appellant instituted this suit to recover upon a promissory note for the sum of $22,500, dated the 18th day of August, 1885, and payable on the 15th day of August,' 1886.

The note was payable to the order of W. B. Blocker, and by him endorsed to the San Antonio National Bank. It was a joint and several obligation, and was signed by the makers as follows: “ J. R. Blocker,” “J. S. Blocker,” “E. Henielle,” “W. S. Oarothers.”

It was alleged by defendants and proved that J. R. Blocker was the principal, and that all of the other makers were sureties only.

J. R. Blocker…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. Higginbotham-Bartlett Co. v. PowellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
  2. Thomson v. Findlater Hardware Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Citizens First National Bank v. JonesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1926
  4. McCamey v. First Nat. Bank of Wichita FallsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
  5. Plummer v. SimmsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API