Legal Opinion
Disney v. City of Concord
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 5, 2011No. A129094PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MARCHIANO, P. J.
The City of Concord, after considerable debate, adopted an ordinance amending its rules for storage of recreational vehicles on residential property. Attorney in propria persona James H. Disney (Disney) sued the City of Concord and the members of its city council (collectively, Concord) to have the ordinance declared unconstitutional, and to enjoin its enforcement. The trial court granted Concord’s motion for judgment on the pleadings. We conclude that Disney’s arguments against the ordinance lack merit, and affirm the judgment for Concord.
I. BACKGROUND
Concord has…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Metromedia, Inc. v. City of San DiegoSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Metromedia, Inc. v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- Shea Homes Ltd. Partnership v. County of AlamedaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- Breneric Associates v. City of Del MarCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Kucera v. LizzaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- T-Mobile West LLC v. City and County of S.F.California Supreme Court · 2019
- Clary v. City of Crescent CityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
- Citizens for Free Speech, LLC v. Cnty. of AlamedaDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2018
- T-Mobile West LLC v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- 1 Community Compact v. City of FresnoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2026
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.