Legal Opinion

Glass v. Spaits

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided July 31, 1987PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WEINSTEIN, P.J.Cv.

This matter comes before the Court on defendants’ motion for summary judgment. Movant asserts that plaintiff’s claim is barred by N.J.S.A. 2A:14-2, which provides that:

every action at law for an injury to the person caused by the wrongful act, neglect or default of any person within this state shall be commenced within two years next after the cause of any such action shall have accrued.

Factually, it is undisputed that on June 21, 1984 plaintiff was struck by an automobile resulting in bodily injuries. At the time of the accident plaintiff was engaged in the furtherance of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Insurance Co. of North America v. CarnahanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  2. State v. FrancisCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1926
  3. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Procter & Gamble Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1952
  4. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Eastern Air Lines, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1957
  5. Harleysville Mutual Insurance v. SmithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Holloway v. StateSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1991
  2. Rutgers Casualty Insurance v. VassasSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
  3. Maryland Cas. Co. v. HeiotNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API