Legal Opinion
Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Procter & Gamble Co.
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided June 30, 1952No. 7587PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDoyle, J.
To a petition of the Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company, seeking damages for personal injury in the amount of $50,000, alleged to have been suffered by one Zelma C. Clarke as the result of the negligence of the Procter & Gamble Company, a demurrer was sustained and a judgment was entered for the defendant company, on the ground that the action was not commenced within two years from the time the cause of action accrued. From such final order in the' Court of Common Pleas of Hamilton County, the present appeal has been taken.
It appears in the petition that the claimant, at the time of her…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Trumbull Cliffs Furnace Co. v. ShachovskyOhio Supreme Court · 1924
- Squire, Supt. v. Grn. Trust Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1947
- Skakandy v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
- Freas v. SullivanOhio Supreme Court · 1936
- Collins v. McClureOhio Supreme Court · 1944
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- County of San Diego v. Sanfax Corp.California Supreme Court · 1977
- Connelly v. BalkwillDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1959
- Steven Operating, Inc. v. Home State SavingsDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1984
- Gookin v. NorrisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1978
- Brandler v. Manuel Trevizo Hay Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1987
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.