Legal Opinion

Keeven v. Wakley

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided January 20, 1986No. 15615PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DONALDSON, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal from an order of the magistrate court that (1) the appellant, Sylvester Keeven, was not an omitted spouse in his deceased wife’s will within the meaning of I.C. § 15-2-301 and (2) the decedent’s real property was her separate property. The district court dismissed Keeven’s appeal stating that it was not provided for by statute and that the magistrate’s order was not a final judgment. We reverse the district court’s dismissal of Keeven’s appeal and affirm the magistrate court’s order.

The facts of the case are as follows. Barbara VanLeuven was a widow…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. LePelley v. GrefensonIdaho Supreme Court · 1980
  2. State v. StoddardIdaho Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Freeburn v. FreeburnIdaho Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Olson v. Idaho Department of Water ResourcesIdaho Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Argyle v. SlemakerIdaho Supreme Court · 1978

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Matter of Estate of KeevenIdaho Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Stevens v. StevensIdaho Supreme Court · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API