Legal Opinion

Argyle v. Slemaker

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided October 20, 1978No. 12641PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McFADDEN, Justice.

This appeal involves an action to cancel a deed granting a fifteen-sixteenth (15/16) interest in gas, oil and other mineral rights and to quiet title in property owned by plaintiffs-appellants Delbert and Dora Argyle. Appellants sought to set aside the deed, alleging that: (1) the deed is void because there was no description of the property conveyed prior to delivery, i. e. that the descriptive portion of the form was blank prior to delivery; (2) the deed was fraudulently procured; and (3) the signature of appellant Dora Argyle was forged. The district court entered summary…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Warren v. Indiana Telephone Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Cromwell v. . MacLeanNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  3. Farmer's Insurance Company of Idaho v. BrownIdaho Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Cameron Estates, Inc. v. DeeringNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
  5. Rich v. BraxtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1895

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Argyle v. SlemakerIdaho Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Simons v. SimonsIdaho Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Pullin v. City of KimberlyIdaho Supreme Court · 1979
  4. April Beguesse, Inc. v. Kenneth RammellIdaho Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Montgomery v. MontgomeryIdaho Supreme Court · 2009

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API