Argyle v. Slemaker
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
McFADDEN, Justice.
This appeal involves an action to cancel a deed granting a fifteen-sixteenth (15/16) interest in gas, oil and other mineral rights and to quiet title in property owned by plaintiffs-appellants Delbert and Dora Argyle. Appellants sought to set aside the deed, alleging that: (1) the deed is void because there was no description of the property conveyed prior to delivery, i. e. that the descriptive portion of the form was blank prior to delivery; (2) the deed was fraudulently procured; and (3) the signature of appellant Dora Argyle was forged. The district court entered summary…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Warren v. Indiana Telephone Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1940
- Cromwell v. . MacLeanNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Farmer's Insurance Company of Idaho v. BrownIdaho Supreme Court · 1976
- Cameron Estates, Inc. v. DeeringNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
- Rich v. BraxtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Argyle v. SlemakerIdaho Court of Appeals · 1984
- Simons v. SimonsIdaho Supreme Court · 2000
- Pullin v. City of KimberlyIdaho Supreme Court · 1979
- April Beguesse, Inc. v. Kenneth RammellIdaho Supreme Court · 2014
- Montgomery v. MontgomeryIdaho Supreme Court · 2009
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.