Legal Opinion

Stevens v. Stevens

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 2000No. 25662PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KIDWELL, Justice.

Larry Stevens appeals from the magistrate judge’s order in a divorce proceeding against Deborah Stevens. The magistrate judge held that an oral settlement agreement between Larry and Deborah was unenforceable because it was not written, pursuant to I.C. § 82-917. The magistrate judge’s order was affirmed by the district court acting in its appellate capacity.

I

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Larry and Deborah were married on August 17, 1973 in Bonita, California. Larry was in the military at the time. Their two children were born in 1981 and 1982. Larry retired after serving…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Quiring v. QuiringIdaho Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Samuel v. Hepworth, Nungester & Lezamiz, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Hay v. HayIdaho Supreme Court · 1924
  4. DeChambeau v. Estate of SmithIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Turner v. TurnerIdaho Supreme Court · 1966

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Reed v. ReedIdaho Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Hoskinson v. HoskinsonIdaho Supreme Court · 2003
  3. State, Dept. of Health & Welfare v. HouselIdaho Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Grisham v. GrishamNevada Supreme Court · 2012
  5. MDS INVESTMENTS, LLC v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 2003

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API