Legal Opinion
United States v. Tate & Lyle North American Sugars, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 17, 2002No. 97 CIV 9113 RMBPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
BERMAN, District Judge.
Plaintiff, the United States of America (“Plaintiff” or the “IRS” or the “Government”), filed this action on or about December 10, 1997 to recover a $1,526,100.60 interest payment it asserts it erroneously made to Defendant, Tate & Lyle North American Sugars, Inc. (“Defendant” or “Tate & Lyle”). 1 On November 26, 2001, Plaintiff moved, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7, for an order disqualifying the law firm of Burt, Maner & Miller (“BM & M”) from representing Defendant at trial. For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiffs motion is denied.
1.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Edward E. Colton and Lillian Kaltman v. United States of America, United States of America v. Edward E. ColtonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
- S & S Hotel Ventures Limited Partnership v. 777 S. H. Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1987
- George Lamborn, Henry Maringer, and Lamar Commodities, a Partnership v. Thomas H. Dittmer and Dittmer International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- Rice v. BaronDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1978
- Paramount Communications, Inc. v. DonaghyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1994
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Capponi Ex Rel. Capponi v. MurphyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- City of Almaty, Kazakhstan v. SaterDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2025
- Quality Door & Hardware, Inc. v. Stanley Security Solutions, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2020
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. 21st Century Pharmacy, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2020