Legal Opinion
Rice v. Baron
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 6, 1978No. 77 Civ. 1890(RLC)PublishedCited by 51 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROBERT L. CARTER, District Judge.
OPINION
Plaintiffs, Henry Hart Rice, Abram Barkan and James Pelt & Co. (“Felt”) commenced this action against the defendant, Irwin Baron, alleging that Baron had violated certain provisions of the federal securities laws 1 and had committed common law fraud in connection with his sale of Felt shares to the plaintiffs in 1971. In his answer, Baron denied the material allegations of the complaint, raised certain affirmative defenses, asserted two counterclaims, and joined two additional parties as counterclaim defendants — Harrow Property Corporation (“Harrow”)…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Cinema 5, Ltd. v. Cinerama, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
- In Re Yarn Processing Patent Validity Litigation. Celanese Corporation and Fiber Industries, Inc. v. Leesona Corporation, Lex Tex Ltd., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
- The Nck Organization Ltd. And William E. Greene, Jr. v. Walter W. BregmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
- In re KellyNew York Court of Appeals · 1968
- In re Grand Jury Subpoena Directing TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- George Lamborn, Henry Maringer, and Lamar Commodities, a Partnership v. Thomas H. Dittmer and Dittmer International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- Lumbard v. Maglia, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1985
- Lussier v. Mau-Van Development, Inc. IHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1983
- Colyer v. SmithDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1999
- Maddocks v. RickerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1988
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.