Anderson v. Duncan
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
MACY, Justice.
Appellant Gloria Anderson appeals from the order in which the trial court granted Appellees Kenneth Duncan and Patty Duncan’s motion for a judgment as a matter of law upon finding that a causal connection did not exist between Anderson’s slip and fall and the condition of the Duncans’ property.
We affirm.
ISSUES
Anderson presents two issues in her appeal:
1. Did the trial court err in granting Appellees’ Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law?
2. Did the trial court err in refusing to admit Appellant’s x-ray exhibits?
FACTS
The Duncans owned a house in Wheatland. A sidewalk ran from…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Bluejacket v. CarneyWyoming Supreme Court · 1976
- Lemos v. MaddenWyoming Supreme Court · 1921
- Buckley v. BellWyoming Supreme Court · 1985
- Natural Gas Processing Co. v. HullWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
- Bettencourt v. Pride Well Service, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1987
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Steven F. LudlowWyoming Supreme Court · 2015
- Board of County Commissioners Ex Rel. Teton County Sheriff's Department v. BassettWyoming Supreme Court · 2000
- Allen v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
- Stroup v. OedekovenWyoming Supreme Court · 1999
- Gore v. SherardWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.