Legal Opinion

Bettencourt v. Pride Well Service, Inc.

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided April 17, 1987No. 86-43PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, Justice.

The question which we must address in this case is whether a summary judgment appropriately may be entered against an injured person who is afflicted with traumatic amnesia and for that reason is unable to specify what act or omission caused his injury. The district court held that there was no genuine issue of material fact in this case and that the several defendants were entitled to summary judgment as a matter of law because proximate cause, one of the elements of a cause of action for negligence, could not be established through the testimony of the injured person or…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Leonard Thornton and William Carothers, Etc. v. James E. EvansCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
  2. McClellan v. TottenhoffWyoming Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Barnette v. DoyleWyoming Supreme Court · 1981
  4. England v. SimmonsWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Reno Livestock Corp. v. Sun Oil Co.(Delaware)Wyoming Supreme Court · 1981

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Davenport v. EpperlyWyoming Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Downen v. Sinclair Oil Corp.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Stephenson v. Pacific Power & Light Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Natural Gas Processing Co. v. HullWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Allmaras v. MudgeWyoming Supreme Court · 1991

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API