Legal Opinion

Lawin v. Pepe

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided August 11, 1950No. 35,178PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Matson, Justice.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment in a replevin action.

On October 12, 19áS, Howard Gilson, an auto salesman from St. Paul, who was then in possession of a Buiek automobile and the registration card thereto pertaining, which bore the notarized signature of the registered owner, P. J. Delaney, as vendor, called on defendant Earl J. Pepe and Dorothea A. Hoefer (Dorothea was the wife of Earl but was still using her maiden name) of Osakis. Pursuant to a sale then made, Gilson delivered possession of the Buick and the registration card, which was then completed to show Dorothea A.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Flaugh v. Egan Chevrolet, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
  2. Livingston v. StevensSupreme Court of Iowa · 1903
  3. Holmes v. Lilygren Motor Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
  4. Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance v. KingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
  5. Malott v. General MacHinery Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1943

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re SettemDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1954
  2. Farmers State Bank of Delavan v. JenkinsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API