Legal Opinion

Sanieoff v. Ho

Massachusetts Superior Court

Decided April 14, 1997No. 9402789Published

1Opinion of the CourtFabricant, J.

INTRODUCTION

This case arises from a failed real estate transaction. The disappointed buyer seeks an order of specific performance; the seller has counterclaimed for damages for abuse of process and other torts. Presently before the Court are the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment on the plaintiffs claims. For the reasons that will be stated, the Court concludes that the defendant is entitled to summary judgment on those claims.1

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

The record presently before the Court consists of pleadings, affidavits, exhibits thereto, and excerpts from depositions. These items…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Kourouvacilis v. General Motors Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  3. Pederson v. Time, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
  4. Community National Bank v. DawesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  5. Cassesso v. Commissioner of CorrectionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API