Legal Opinion

Banks v. Booher

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided March 5, 2025No. 1:24-cv-00474Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA MARVIN BANKS, ., Plaintiffs, CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:24-cv-00474 v. (SAPORITO, J.) BRADLEY BOOHER, ., Defendants. MEMORANDUM Plaintiffs Marvin Banks, Dale Arnold, and Carl L. Varner proceed in a fee-paid case challenging the Pennsylvania Department of Corrections (“DOC”) policy for observance of Native American holidays. Defendants1 move to dismiss the operative complaint (Doc. 23), and plaintiffs request appointment of counsel (Docs. 19, 27). For the reasons described below, the Court will grant defendants’ motion in part, permit…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  3. Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Turner v. SafleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. O'Lone v. Estate of ShabazzSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API