Legal Opinion

Michael J. Bransfield & Sons, Inc. v. City of Chicago

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided January 17, 1951No. Gen. 44,974PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scanlan

City of Chicago, defendant, appeals from an injunctional judgment order entered in a mandamus proceeding entitled Michael J. Bransfield & Sons, Inc., plaintiff, v. City of Chicago, a Municipal Corporation, defendant. The case was tried by the court upon the pleadings and evidence.

The petition of plaintiff alleges that the City of Chicago (hereinafter sometimes called City) issued special assessment bonds to anticipate the collection of special assessments levied against property assessed for the cost of a local improvement identified as City of Chicago Special Assessment Warrant 53716; that…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Rothschild v. Village of Calumet ParkIllinois Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Conway v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Friedman v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1940
  4. People Ex Rel. John v. Farwell Co v. KellyIllinois Supreme Court · 1935
  5. People Ex Rel. Farwell v. KellyIllinois Supreme Court · 1937

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. 2416 Corp. v. Board of Trustees of University of IllinoisAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  2. Loewenthal Securities Co. v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1951
  3. Hardin v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API