Legal Opinion

Branson v. Port of Seattle

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 18, 2004No. 73766-5PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

101 P.3d 67 (2004)

Douglas M. BRANSON, individually and on behalf of all other similarly situated persons, Petitioner,

v.

PORT OF SEATTLE, Respondent, and

CMC Investments, Inc. d/b/a Dollar Rent a Car; Rainier Leasing Corporation d/b/a Advantage Rent-A-Car; Pacific Northwest Rental and Leasing, Inc. d/b/a Thrifty Car Rental; and Enterprise Leasing Company d/b/a Enterprise Rent-A-Car, Defendants.

No. 73766-5.

Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

Argued February 24, 2004.

Decided November 18, 2004.

Arthur Cary Claflin, Spencer Hall, W. Scott Zanzig, Hall Zanzig Claflin McEachern PLLC, Seattle, for…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. State v. J.P.Washington Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Seattle School District No. 1 v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Bowles v. Department of Retirement SystemsWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Walker v. MunroWashington Supreme Court · 1994

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Five Corners Family Farmers v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2011
  2. City of Spokane v. Spokane CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  3. City of Spokane v. County of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Pacific Northwest Shooting Park Ass'n v. City of SequimWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Burns v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 2007

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API