Legal Opinion · Dissent

Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Karen A. Taylor

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided November 10, 2016No. 16–0130Published

1DissentWaterman, Justice

I respectfully dissent because the majority’s six-month suspension is too lenient in light of our precedent. Attorney Taylor willfully failed to pay any self-employment taxes or income taxes or file her state and federal tax returns for eleven years. The majority acknowledges without elaboration that “Taylor had a substantial income over this time period that would have allowed her to pay her taxes.” Her actual income, of course, is relevant' to the sanction.' This is not a case where the lawyer failed to realize her income was high ' enough to require a tax return, or where the lawyer was…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. WalmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
  2. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Eric K. ParrishSupreme Court of Iowa · 2011
  3. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Matthew M. BolesSupreme Court of Iowa · 2012
  4. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Rodney Howard PowellSupreme Court of Iowa · 2013
  5. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. William S. MorrisSupreme Court of Iowa · 2014

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API