Legal Opinion

Werdann v. Mel Hambelton Ford, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided November 26, 2003No. 88,643PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Malone, j.:

Brenda Werdann appeals the amount of damages awarded by the trial court for her successful claim of conversion. She also appeals the trial court’s decision granting summary judgment in favor of Mel Hambelton Ford, Inc. (Mel Hambelton) on her federal Truth in Lending Act (TILA), 15 U.S.C. § 1601 (2000) et seq., claim and her federal “Odometer Act” (FOA), 49 U.S.C. § 32701 (2000) etseq., claim. Mel Hambelton cross-appeals, alleging that the trial court erred in assessing punitive damages against Mel Hambelton and in awarding attorney fees to Werdann.

On March 11, 2000, Werdann and her…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Smith v. PrintupSupreme Court of Kansas · 1993
  2. Henderson v. HassurSupreme Court of Kansas · 1979
  3. Bracken v. Dixon Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2002
  4. Mohr v. State Bank of StanleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1987
  5. Suiter v. Mitchell Motor Coach Sales, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Hysten v. Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
  2. Burgess v. Shampooch Pet Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2006
  3. Saddlewood Downs, L.L.C. v. Holland Corp.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2004
  4. Bender v. Kansas Secured Title & Abstract Co.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2005
  5. Jayhawk 910VP, LLC v. WindAirWest, LLCDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2020

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API