Legal Opinion

State v. Bythrow

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 3, 1990No. 56565-1PublishedCited by 81 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDore, J.

— The trial court denied defendant's motion to sever two counts of robbery after balancing possible prejudice to defendant to have a fair trial and the concern for judicial economy. After conviction on both counts and affir-mance by the Court of Appeals, defendant sought review. We affirm.

Facts

Gull Station Robbery

On October 31, 1987, a Gull station in Kent was robbed by two men. The attendant on duty testified that defendant Daniel Bythrow came around the counter, pulled out a knife, held it to his back and demanded money. Bythrow took the money out of the till while a second man acted as a…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Nathan L. Drew v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1964
  2. People v. BeanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  3. State v. TharpWashington Supreme Court · 1981
  4. State v. GrisbyWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  5. State v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1986

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by81 opinions

  1. State v. RussellWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  2. In Re DavisWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  3. In re the Personal Restraint of DavisWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  4. State v. LoughWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  5. State v. KalakoskyWashington Supreme Court · 1993

76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API