Legal Opinion

State v. Kalakosky

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 27, 1993No. 56249-1PublishedCited by 106 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAndersen, C.J.

Facts of Case

A jury found the defendant Paul H. Kalakosky guilty of four rapes and one attempted rape. Kalakosky appeals these convictions claiming: (1) a search warrant for his residence, trailer and vehicles was not supported by probable cause; (2) the taking of blood samples with a warrant, but without notice and an adversarial hearing, violated his Fourth, Fifth and Sixth Amendment rights; (3) the five counts should have been severed and tried separately; (4) the trial court erred in admitting DNA (deoxyribonucleic acid) evidence which linked him to one of the rapes; and (5) the trial…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
  5. Pennsylvania v. RitchieSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by106 opinions

  1. State v. RussellWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State v. GentryWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  3. People v. StanawayMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
  4. State v. GregoryWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  5. State v. CopelandWashington Supreme Court · 1996

101 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API