Legal Opinion
McCandless v. Furlaud
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided November 11, 1935No. 26Published
1Opinion of the Court 1
296 U.S. 140 (1935)
McCANDLESS, RECEIVER,
v.
FURLAUD ET AL.
No. 26.
Supreme Court of United States.
Argued October 21, 22, 1935.
Decided November 11, 1935.
CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT.
Mr. Ralph Royall for petitioner.
Mr. Louis B. Eppstein, with whom Messrs. Ira W. Hirshfield and Louis J. Altkrug were on the brief, for respondents.
2Opinion of the Court · CardozoJustice Cardozo
The suit is by a receiver of an insolvent corporation to compel its promoters and their confederates to restore illicit gains.
At the time of the challenged acts Maxime H. Furlaud was the president and principal shareholder of Furlaud &…
Also in this document: Dissent.
3Cases cited64 opinions
- Central Transportation Co. v. Pullman's Palace Car Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Hollins v. Brierfield Coal & Iron Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Geddes v. Anaconda Copper Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Kent v. . Quicksilver Mining Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1879
- Sinclair Refining Co. v. Jenkins Petroleum Process Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.