Legal Opinion

Philpot v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided August 16, 1966PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

In conference this court divided over (a) the admissibility of a confession given by the defendant while in custody in a back room at the station, and (b) the trial court’s refusal of a continuance because the Alabama statutes exclude all women from serving as jurors.

We certified to the Supreme Court of Alabama the questions and were given the answers which appear in the statement of the case along with the pertinent facts of the case.

The confession here received was not within the influence of Escobedo v. Illinois, 378 U.S. 478, 84 S.Ct. 1758, 12 L. Ed.2d 977, so as to require a reversal on…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Johnson v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. Tehan v. United States Ex Rel. ShottSupreme Court of the United States · 1965

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Watson v. NixDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 1982
  2. Moore v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1975
  3. Freeland v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1966
  4. Grace v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1976
  5. Butler v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1977

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API