Legal Opinion
Satterlee v. Harris
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided July 18, 1932No. 600PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MeDERMOTT, Circuit Judge.
In an equity receivership, the trial court entered an order requiring all creditors of the corporation to file their claims within a stated period, failing which they should be barred from asserting the same against the receiver. Appellants filed their separate claims, to which the receiver filed his objections. A special master was appointed to hear all contested claims and to report thereon. Some evidence was taken on appellants’ claims before the master, and upon appellants’ application, further hearings were continued from time to time. Thereupon the appellants…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Webster v. FallSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- La BourgogneSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Ex Parte Skinner & Eddy Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Swift v. Black Panther Oil & Gas Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1917
- Odell v. H. Batterman Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1915
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Deckert v. Independence Shares Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company, a Corporation v. Jessie W. JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1956
- Larkin Packer Co. v. Hinderliter Tool Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1932
- United States v. Kansas City, Kan.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1946
- De Long v. Jefferson Standard Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1940
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.