Legal Opinion

Larkin Packer Co. v. Hinderliter Tool Co.

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided August 20, 1932No. 644PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MeDERMOTT, Circuit Judge.

On August 8, 1931, the trial court rendered a decree perpetually enjoining appellant from infringing letters patent of appel-lee, and directing an accounting of the profits. Thirty-one days thereafter, an appeal from such decree was petitioned for and allowed. The appellee moves to dismiss the appeal.

If the appeal was not taken within the period allowed by the applicable statute, Act of Feb. 28, 1927 (28 USC § 227a [28 USCA § 227a]), this court is without jurisdiction to hear it. Western Silo Co. v. Morris (C. C. A. 8) 33 F.(2d) 285; Northwestern Pub. Serv. Co. v.…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Swift & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  2. Oklahoma v. TextasSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  3. Last Chance Mining Co. v. Tyler Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895
  4. Aspen Mining & Smelting Co. v. BillingsSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  5. Conboy v. First Nat. Bank of Jersey CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1906

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Union National Bank v. LambSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Southland Industries, Inc. v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938
  3. National Labor Relations Board v. Hopwood Retinning Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
  4. Clarke v. Hot Springs Electric Light & Power Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1935
  5. Pueblo De Taos v. ArchuletaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1933

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API